ΣSigmaStudio Ask AI Русский Log in

ADAU1701 DAC2&3 noise

SigmaDSP & SigmaStudio Rslosar520 Jul 31, 2019 00:00 9 replies Original on forum ↗
Subscribe
Rslosar520 Question
Jul 31, 2019 00:00

Hello, I use ADAU1701 as crossover for loudspeakers. Its on freeDSP Classic SMD B board. Sound from DAC0&1 is OK, no noise. But DAC2&3 have unacceptable high noise. I would describe it as white noise. When I power down DAC in SigmaStudio, noise is gone.

Here are things I already tried

Mutliple power supplies (switching, linear, battery)

Used ADAU as tone generator to eliminate ADC, noise was on DAC2&3, DAC0&1 were clean

Measured with RoomEqWizard, RTA shows DAC3(red) has 15-20dB more noise than DAC0(green)

There are many people using this board without problems, so I don't expect the board is bad, or badly designed. All SMD components were pre-assembled.

Amplifiers are class AB, have 27dB gain and I could not measure/hear their noise.

Is this ADAU1701 broken?

Thanks

Best regards

Robert Slosar

Edit Notes
Grammar

[edited by: Rslosar520 at 3:27 PM (GMT 0) on 31 Jul 2019]

Audio Signal Processors

SigmaDSP Audio Processors

adau1701

freeDSP_THDnoise.jpg
freeDSP_THDnoise.jpg
KJBob Reply
Jul 31, 2019 00:00

Hello Robert,

Your graph shows the noise about 94 dB below your 1 KHz tone for DACs 2-3, and 110 dB on DACs 1-2. The ADAU1701 data sheet spec is 104 dB, so really you're not doing all that badly. I'm wondering how your results compare with that of other FreeDSP Classic users. Have you tried sharing your tests while asking about the audible and measured noise at the FreeDSP forum? https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-line-level/285260-freedsp-main-thread.html

The data sheet's noise specs are typical and thus likely not 100% tested on individual production chips. Still, the difference between outputs is puzzling. Check the bypass capacitors at pins 34, 36, 40, 41, and 48 to GND (pin 1) -- examine the soldering at these pins and at the caps. Since most of your measured noise is at higher frequency, perhaps setting up DACs 1, 2 for your tweeters and the other DACs for the bass drivers may help keep the perceived noise to a manageable level.

I'm afraid I'm an old dinosaur who was happy with the 60 dB S/N of cassette tape!

Best regards,

Bob

Dino_DJ.jpg
Dino_DJ.jpg
Rslosar520 Reply
Aug 1, 2019 00:00

Hello Bob, when I saw that little difference in measurements I would not believe that I can hear it, but from DAC2&3 I can hear loud noise from distance more than 3m from 94dB/2.83V tweeter, while from DAC0&1 only slight hiss from distance of 0.5m and less. It was on the same amplifier and the same tweeter. I also tried different amplifier, results were the same.

I already wrote about my problem in that thread on diyaudio (DarkOne is my nickname there)

All these SMDs were pre-assembled, I don't expect and I don't see any bad joints.

Your suggestion about using the noisy DACs for bass and other for treble is not usable here. My aluminium cone woofers have massive peaks above 3kHz to more than 100dB/2.83V, so the noise will be even more amplified.

I've attached little sound clip comparing outputs. Recorded with ECM8000 microphone and ESI Maya22USB interface. Mic distance was 20cm, amplifier gain 27dB and loudspeaker sensitivity approx. 88dBPlay this audio clip

freeDSP.ogg828.9 KB
KJBob Reply
Aug 1, 2019 00:00

Hello Robert,

Sorry I haven't been very helpful. The math does explain why the noise is quite audible. 27 dB of amplification of the 0.9 Vrms DAC output works out to 20 Vrms, or 50 watts into eight ohms. This is 17 dB above one watt, so your full-scale SPL at one meter from the speaker is 88 + 17 = 105 dB. Subtract the 94 dB worst-case DAC S/N and this leaves 11 dB SPL, which could be audible (and quite annoying) in a quiet room. Such can often be the case with bi-amplified applications like this one -- where post-DSP, the gain is always at max. Since you tried the FreeDSP forum, I assume that the answers there, if any, were less than helpful.

Since your recorded noise appears "brighter" for outputs 2 and 3, perhaps there's an issue with the components in the active output filters for these channels. Failing that, it appears that you have a "bad" ADAU1701 -- or simply I'm out of ideas on what else could be causing two DACs to be this much noisier than the other two. Perhaps someone else here has another suggestion.

Best regards,

Bob

Rslosar520 Reply
Aug 2, 2019 00:00

Probably, I would not complain about noise if drivers of my new loudspeakers are 88dB or less sensitive, but the woofer is 91dB and has breakups of 100dB at 4kHz. And the tweeter is around 94dB. Sensitivity of these drivers make the situation much worse.

I have nothing to lose now, hot air station is being shipped to me and I have 3 spare chips to play with.

Thanks

Regards

Robert

DaveThib Reply
Aug 2, 2019 00:00

Hello Robert,

I went in to the lab and made some measurements today. I used a larger evaluation board that has all four outputs available unlike the MINI board that has only two available on a jack.

This board has a choice of a passive filter on the DAC or a 2-pole active filter which will give you better specs but I just used the passive single pole filter.

I did two tests. One is an FFT of a signal coming into the ADC going through the DSP and out of the DACs. I only used one channel of ADC so the signal was exactly the same going to all four DACs. So you will see the distortion of the entire signal chain not just the DACs.

Then the second test I muted the signal in the DSP and ran the FFT to get just a noise floor. All four channels were pretty much the same. So something is up with the board.

Here is the SigmaStudio Project.

Dave T

SigmaStudio-Project.JPG
SigmaStudio-Project.JPG
FFT-with-1K-tone.JPG
FFT-with-1K-tone.JPG
FFT-with-DACs-Muted-in-DSP.JPG
FFT-with-DACs-Muted-in-DSP.JPG
Rslosar520 Reply
Aug 3, 2019 00:00

Hello Dave, thanks a lot for your input. Now I know that the chip have enough potential. When I did power down DAC2&3, the noise disappears, that means that analog section with filter is OK. All DACs have common filter decoupling pin, so I expect that there is not a problem as DAC0&1 works without noise. Only thing I can think of is that maybe the chip was damaged during soldering, or by static discharge. I'm waiting for delivery of hot air station, so I'll probably replace the ADAU chip, or should I look elsewhere?

Thanks

Best regards

Robert

KJBob Reply
Aug 4, 2019 00:00

Hi Robert,

Sometimes, noting beats having more than one prototype. It makes it easier to discover unit-to-unit variations, Where I work we're primarily a contract manufacturer, so of course we can easily make several Changing the chip is a good idea when nothing else has identified the problem -- at least you'll know if the issue is a fluke or is more systemic. I do notice that your graph shows a red spike at around 14 KHz -- a tone not present in the other DAC -- which reminds me of this post: https://ez.analog.com/dsp/sigmadsp/f/q-a/65144/adau1701-noise-tone-issues You could try feeding the affected DAC with a small DC source (about 0.005) to see if the excessive noise changes.

Best regards,

Bob

Rslosar520 Reply
Aug 5, 2019 00:00

Hi Bob, that post covers some noise while DACs are idle. In my measurements DACs are not idle, they play 1kHz tone from the input. I hope that hot air station arrives soon. I'll let you know the result. But it might take 2+ weeks, vacation is coming.

Best Regards

Robert

Rslosar520 Reply
Aug 15, 2019 00:00

Hello Everybody, hot air station arrived so I could move on. Replaced ADAU chip did not resolve problem, got the same results as before. Desoldering MCLK buffer circuit didn't make any change. Taking signal directly from the chip (avoiding opamps & muting circuits) did no change.

I'm giving up, hopefully freedsp team will refund me and I send it back to them.

Lets hope I wil enjoy minidsp 2x4HD which I purchased today.