ΣSigmaStudio Ask AI Русский Log in

ADaU1442 R/L mixer issue

SigmaDSP & SigmaStudio HansXie Mar 11, 2011 00:00 7 replies Original on forum ↗
Subscribe
HansXie Question
Mar 11, 2011 00:00

Hi,

Here, I meets a promblem when do Mixer processing on ADAU1442, ADC sampling from R/L signal, and I do the mixer function such as changing voice in Kalar OK, but I find when do mixer, the fequency over 1KHZ attenuate almost disappeared. do the single channel R or L function that is ok and that function I do it before on ADAU1701 that is ok.

So,please help to explain may what be caused on this.

Thansk,

Hans

Audio Signal Processors

adau1442

SigmaDSP Audio Processors

adau1701

ADIApproved Reply
Mar 11, 2011 00:00

Hi Hans,

Could you please upload a simple version of the SigmaStudio .dspproj file to your post so I can look at it?

HansXie Reply
Mar 14, 2011 00:00

Dear Brett,

Please find the attachment.

Thanks and best regards,

Hans Xie,

S.FA Manager

Excelpoint International Trading (Shanghai) Co.Ltd.-Xiamen Branch

Your Total Solutions Provider

Tel: (86-592) 312 2566 x 207

Fax: (86-592) 504 23865

Mobile: (86) 13328787675

Email: hans.xie <mailto:hans.xie@excelpoint.com.cn> @excelpoint.com.cn

URL: <http://www.excelpoint.com.cn/>; www.excelpoint.com.cn

您是否有ADI产品的相关问题无法及时解决?

欢迎 将您的问题寄往   <mailto:cic.asia@analog.com> cic.asia@analog.com 

热线电话: (+86)4006-100-006

发件人: BrettG analog@sgaur.hosted.jivesoftware.com

发送时间: 2011年3月12日 3:30

收件人: Hans Xie

主题: New message: "ADaU1442 R/L mixer issue"

<https://ez.analog.com/index.jspa>; Analog Devices EngineerZone

ADaU1442 R/L mixer issue

reply from BrettG <https://ez.analog.com/people/BrettG>; in SigmaDSP Processors - View the full discussion <https://ez.analog.com/message/20901#20901

HansXie Reply
Mar 14, 2011 00:00

please find the attachment.

ADIApproved Reply
Mar 17, 2011 00:00

Unfortunately there was no .dspproj file included in the attachment. Could you please try again?

HansXie Reply
Mar 17, 2011 00:00

Sorry,please find the attachemnt with pro.

Br,

Hans

ADIApproved Reply
Mar 21, 2011 00:00

Hi Hans,

Unfortunately, I do not see the same results as you are seeing. First I tested the output of the circuit with a white noise source. You can see I got a flat response:

Then I turned the noise source off and saw the noise floor drop:

Here's a close up of the spectrum with the mute disabled:

Here's with the mute enabled:

The level went down slightly, but the frequency response didn't change.

Then I tried to read back the signal levels directly in the project. With no mute, the white noise source's RMS level is 0.25, and the output's RMS level is 0.5, which makes sense because we're summing two noise signals together with 0 dB of gain:

When I activate the mute, I see that the level drops down 6 dB to 0.25, which is what we expect because one input to the mixer is inactive:

If there was any attenuation of high frequencies in the mixer, that number would definitely be less than 0.25. So, I definitely am not getting the same results as you.

By the way, the mixer's internal algorithm only uses addition and linear gain. It has no frequency-dependent operations, so it could not change the frequency response in any way.

I was testing this on the EVAL-ADAU1442EBZ evaluation board. It's possible that if you are using another board, the other hardware (such as converters) are playing a role on your measurements.

28c3045eb8ca1d413f6da1210fa298a6.jpg
28c3045eb8ca1d413f6da1210fa298a6.jpg
28c3045eb8ca1d413f6da1210fa298a6.jpg-450x377.jpg
28c3045eb8ca1d413f6da1210fa298a6.jpg-450x377.jpg
f4ace704cecbe971697c0e8c08b63586.jpg
f4ace704cecbe971697c0e8c08b63586.jpg
f4ace704cecbe971697c0e8c08b63586.jpg-450x377.jpg
f4ace704cecbe971697c0e8c08b63586.jpg-450x377.jpg
8c6bb8f443b66c8a506c1feb3af755a6.jpg
8c6bb8f443b66c8a506c1feb3af755a6.jpg
8c6bb8f443b66c8a506c1feb3af755a6.jpg-450x377.jpg
8c6bb8f443b66c8a506c1feb3af755a6.jpg-450x377.jpg
5ae180ff2d7082ef5fc7c10cd1775d4a.jpg
5ae180ff2d7082ef5fc7c10cd1775d4a.jpg
5ae180ff2d7082ef5fc7c10cd1775d4a.jpg-450x377.jpg
5ae180ff2d7082ef5fc7c10cd1775d4a.jpg-450x377.jpg
87b2ab60f1129f8261255236c833dcd6.jpg
87b2ab60f1129f8261255236c833dcd6.jpg
87b2ab60f1129f8261255236c833dcd6.jpg-450x150.jpg
87b2ab60f1129f8261255236c833dcd6.jpg-450x150.jpg
6aa085ac4639f10e53aea8e066cc296b.jpg
6aa085ac4639f10e53aea8e066cc296b.jpg
6aa085ac4639f10e53aea8e066cc296b.jpg-450x150.jpg
6aa085ac4639f10e53aea8e066cc296b.jpg-450x150.jpg
HansXie Reply
Apr 1, 2011 00:00

Dear Brett,

thanks for your great support, after long time debugging we find there is wrong configure from the I/O input LRC (POS)register.and the issue settled.

Thanks again, cheers!

Hans