EngineerZone Forum
Q&A from Analog Devices EngineerZone: SigmaDSP/SigmaStudio and DSP discussions (8 topics).
8 topics · 51 messages
Filtered by: #adau1787z ✕
-
SigmaDSP (SDSP) to the FastDSP (FDSP)
I recently purchased the EVAL-ADAU1787Z evaluation board and have been working with SigmaStudio 4.7. Despite following the documentation and building a correct signal path from the SigmaDSP (SDSP) to
-
ADAU1787 Eval Board Source Files
Hey ADI, I'm currently working on a product involving the ADAU1787. Are you able to provide the source design files for the ADAU1787 Eval board (ie - Altium, Orcad, PADS, etc)? If not, are you able to
-
Problem with using EVAL - ADAU1787Z
Hi, We purchased one evaluation board for the ADAU1787. I've been working on the evaluation board using the relevant guide and trying to make it work. so far unsuccessfully. I connected a microphone t
-
Parameter readback and update not working?
Hello, I am having an issue while working with mij EVAL-ADAU1787Z board in SigmaStudio. I am trying to change the gain value of a gain block using a Parameter Update block. Something that looks like i
-
Feedback loop doesn't work on ADAU1787 FastDSP
Hello, I am working with an EVAL-ADAU1787Z and want to create an algorithm containing a feedback loop in the FastDSP. However, I can't get it to work. For testing I'm trying to implement the simplest
-
Loading filter coefficients to the FastDSP of a ADAU1787 in SigmaStudio
Hello, I'm working with an EVAL-ADAU1787Z evaluation board in SigmaStudio 4.7. So far I've been using the SigmaDSP to do my signal processing. I now want to move the biquad filtering in my signal chai
-
Output noise EVAL-ADAU1787Z
Hello, I have an issue with my EVAL-1787Z board. If I connect headphones to the stereo output of the board I hear an audible broadband hissing noise. I don't know what the expected noise level is, but
-
[Bug Report] SigmaStudio / Eval ADAU1787Z incorrect parameter names; Real Time Parameter read values and addresses
See the attached project file. I used the Sigma NLMS block to system identify a known, 45 tap (only the first 40 taps are non-zero) FIR so I can see where the coefficients end up in the registers. See